The laws and courts are only fair and just when it is used on others they don't like.
The laws and courts are not fair and unjust when it is used on them.
DAP always demand that Sedition Act be abolished...… but when ISMA president charged for Sedition for inciting the Chinese, DAP is very happy. And when ISMA president is found guilty of sedition in court ...… DAP says Sedition sentence is not heavy enough !
So, DAP wants the sedition act to be abolished or not? Or they want the sedition act to have heavier minimum sentences including mandatory jail terms?
Make it simple lah, why not DAP just ask for the sedition act to be amended to explicitly say it cannot be used against DAP members?
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan
Sendiri Tulis Sendiri Tanggung Ya, Penulis Blog Tidak Bertanggungjawab Ke atas Implaksi Perundangan Yang Dikenakan Oleh Pihak Berkuasa Ke atas Mana-mana Ulasan Yang Menyalahi Perundangan Yang berkuatkuasa